References
1. Hess C, Ostrom E. Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource. Law Contemp Probl. 2003 Jan 1;66(1/2):111–45.
2. Hess C, Ostrom E. A framework for analysing the microbiological commons. Int Soc Sci J. 2006;58(188):335–349.
3. Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ. Governing Knowledge Commons. In: Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ, editors. Governing Knowledge Commons. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 1–43.
4. Evans B. Genomic Data Commons. In: Strandburg KJ, Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, editors. Governing Medical Knowledge Commons. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 74–101.
5. Ostrom E. An institutional approach to the study of self-organization and self-governance in CPR situations. In: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 29–57.
6. Kahan DM. Reciprocity, Collective Action, and Community Policing. Calif Law Rev. 2002 Oct 1;90(5):1513–39.
7. Imperial MT, Yandle T. Taking Institutions Seriously: Using the IAD Framework to Analyze Fisheries Policy. Soc Nat Resour. 2005;18(6):493–509.
8. Andersson K. Understanding decentralized forest governance: an application of the institutional analysis and development framework. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2006;2(1):25–35.
9. Behnke R. Natural Resource Management in Pastoral Africa. Dev Policy Rev. 1994;12(1):5–28.
10. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 1990. 298 p.
11. Hess C, Ostrom E. A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In: Hess C, Ostrom E, editors. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. MIT Press; 2011. p. 41–82.
12. Hess C, Ostrom E. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. MIT Press; 2011. 381 p.
13. Hess C. The unfolding of the knowledge commons. St Antonys Int Rev. 2012;8(1):13–24.
14. Strandburg KJ, Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, editors. Governing Medical Knowledge Commons. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 436 p.
15. Bell JW. Our Genome in Common: Genomic Data Release Policies and the Academic Librarian. Portal Libr Acad. 2003;3(2):293–306.
16. Caulfield T, Harmon SH, Joly Y. Open science versus commercialization: a modern research conflict? G enome Med. 2012 Feb 27;4(2):17.
17. Cornel MC, Bonham VL. Genomics for all in the 21st century? J Community Genet. 2017 Oct 1;8(4):249–51.
18. Hetu M, Koutouki K, Joly Y. Genomics for All: International Open Science Genomics Projects and Capacity Building in the Developing World. Front Genet [Internet]. 2019 Feb 15 [cited 2019 May 4];10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6384230/
19. Maxson Jones K, Ankeny RA, Cook-Deegan R. The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and rinciples for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project. J Hist Biol. 2018;51(4):693–805.
20. Cole DH. Learning from Lin: Lessons from the Natural Commons for the Knowledge Commons. In: Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ, editors. Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 45–68.
21. Geary J, Bubela T. Governance of a global genetic resource commons for non-commercial research: A case-study of the DNA barcode commons. Int J Commons. 2019 Apr 25;13(1):205–43.
22. Geary J, Reay T, Bubela T. The Impact of Heterogeneity in a Global Knowledge Commons: Implications for Governance of the DNA Barcode Commons. Int J Commons. 2019 Oct 30;13(2):909–930.